<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pixelrage.net &#187; categories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pixelrage.net/tag/categories/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pixelrage.net</link>
	<description>Ramblings of An (At-Home) Internet Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Usability Fail: Category Options that Suck</title>
		<link>http://www.pixelrage.net/website-structure/usability-fail-category-options-that-suck</link>
		<comments>http://www.pixelrage.net/website-structure/usability-fail-category-options-that-suck#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pixelrage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Website Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pixelrage.net/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have undoubtedly been cases where you&#8217;ve signed up or registered on a social networking, promotions, article submission or user profile site and have had to pick and choose categories for the things you submit to them. Some of them just don&#8217;t seem to have any categories that make sense or fit the material you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have undoubtedly been cases where you&#8217;ve signed up or registered on a social networking, promotions, article submission or user profile site and have had to pick and choose categories for the things you submit to them. Some of them just don&#8217;t seem to have any categories that make sense or fit the material you&#8217;re submitting, and sadly enough, come from some of the biggest sites on the internet. Here are two examples of the ones that piss me off the most!<span id="more-133"></span></p>
<p>For starters, there&#8217;s Digg. I know there are a lot of people who would totally get my back on this one. There have been way too many times where I couldn&#8217;t figure out where to stick an article. It&#8217;s as if the team who originally thought of the basic categories that site submissions could fall into had done it on a rush basis, and never went back to fix it. Here&#8217;s a screenshot of Digg&#8217;s category selection:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-134" title="digg-categories-suck" src="http://www.pixelrage.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/digg-categories-suck.jpg" alt="digg-categories-suck" width="500" height="190" /><br />
I can understand the &#8220;bucket list&#8221; on the left, but it&#8217;s some of the sub-categories that are beyond all human reasoning. Where do I submit an article about blogging? Do I have to shoe-horn it into &#8220;Technology/Industry News,&#8221; where articles about smartphones and hydrogen cars go? How about an article about SEO or one about Marketing, does that also have to get crammed into &#8220;Technology/Industry News?&#8221; How about law &#8211; do I have to stick that in &#8220;Business &amp; Finance?&#8221; Futhermore, why didn&#8217;t they just create two separate categories for &#8220;Business&#8221; and for &#8220;Finance?&#8221; They are entirely separate fields. Would something related to web or graphic design have to get stuck into &#8220;Arts &amp; Culture?&#8221; I sure as hell wouldn&#8217;t want to put it in there. And, why would that go into the &#8220;Lifestyle&#8221; bucket, shouldn&#8217;t it be in something related to business or technology (or, uhh, ART?)</p>
<p>Digg&#8217;s category choices aren&#8217;t entirely awful, they just need more options and a lot more refining. There&#8217;s something much, much worse.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.squidoo.com/facebookpage">Facebook Page</a>&#8216;s categories really take the cake. You start off with three broad buckets: &#8220;Local,&#8221; &#8220;Brand, Product or Organization&#8221; and &#8220;Artist, Band or Public Figure.&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-135" title="facebook-page-categories-suck" src="http://www.pixelrage.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/facebook-page-categories-suck.jpg" alt="facebook-page-categories-suck" width="390" height="442" /></p>
<p>There are countless times where not only could I not find a single category to append a Facebook Page to, but the worst part is what happens after you make a decision. Your page is pre-set with hard coded fields that you can&#8217;t change. So, if you want to make a page to connect with people of your ethnic background, nationality or country, you&#8217;re out of luck: there isn&#8217;t a single category that applies to it. You&#8217;d have to go with something like &#8220;Club&#8221; within the &#8220;Local&#8221; bucket. But if you do, you&#8217;d realize that &#8220;Club&#8221; really stands for &#8220;night club,&#8221; not for &#8220;online club&#8221; or something like &#8220;hunting club,&#8221; and your hard coded forms will ask you about parking and hours. I can&#8217;t stand how &#8220;Marketing,&#8221; &#8220;Sales&#8221; or &#8220;Advertising&#8221; aren&#8217;t even an option under any of the buckets. I mean, come on Facebook &#8211; those are HUGE categories, and a lot of people in those industries are creating Facebook pages!</p>
<p>By far, the worst part about creating a Facebook page are those mind-numbingly ridiculous pre-set fields it forces on to your page. You never know what you&#8217;re going to get, either &#8211; the online club you&#8217;ve created might have the misfortune of getting a &#8220;Parking&#8221; or &#8220;Store Hours&#8221; field, or something else completely random that you won&#8217;t be able to remove. Of course, you could simply not type anything in these fields, and they won&#8217;t show up. However, that will leave you with a completely blank &#8220;Info&#8221; page, which will make your Facebook Page look  incomplete and un-engaging. At least give every single page a generic &#8220;Description&#8221; box, so that people can type in a description for their page. You could always type it in one of the worthless fields, which will wind up looking like &#8220;Parking: Welcome to our Fan Page about Italian-Americans&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re creating a site that will let users select categories to drop their submissions into, or set their registered pages or accounts to &#8211; be sure you have a wide array of choices for them. The logical way to do this is to look at well-established web directories that have been around for years: <a href="http://dir.yahoo.com/">Yahoo Directory</a>, <a href="http://directory.google.com/">Google</a> and <a href="http://www.dmoz.org">DMOZ.org</a>. My personal favorite is the directory choice list on <a href="http://www.lensroll.com">Lensroll.com</a> &#8211; it has so many options, and they&#8217;re all important. All of these services have well-done category selections that all of these big networking sites should have mimicked.</p>
<p>By having decent categories, you&#8217;re catering to all different kinds of niches, as well as helping your on and off-site optimization, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pixelrage.net/website-structure/usability-fail-category-options-that-suck/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

